Will hacktivists lead us into WW3?

Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author.

The world of geopolitics is already a minefield of diplomatic tightropes, military posturing, and economic chess games. Add hacktivism to the mix, and suddenly, it’s less a well-orchestrated game of global strategy and more like trying to defuse a bomb while blindfolded—using chopsticks.

The recent cyberattack on X (formerly Twitter), originating from a Ukrainian IP address, has set off alarm bells. Is this the work of rogue Ukrainian actors furious about peace negotiations? Or a classic Russian false-flag operation? Or maybe, just maybe, it’s an entirely unrelated third party stirring the pot for their own reasons? Either way, it’s yet another reminder that in the digital age, wars aren’t just fought with bullets and bombs—they’re waged in cyberspace, too.

Since Russia rolled into Ukraine in 2022, hacktivism has become an unofficial front in the war. Ukrainian-aligned groups like the IT Army of Ukraine have been launching attacks on Russian infrastructure, hitting everything from government websites to financial institutions.

Meanwhile, Anonymous, the infamous decentralized hacking collective, declared “cyber war” against the Russian government, claiming responsibility for various leaks and service disruptions. These groups operate outside traditional chains of command, driven by ideology rather than state orders. And as peace negotiations tiptoe forward, there are bound to be factions—on both sides—who see compromise as betrayal.

Which brings us to the cyberattack on X. The attack was traced back to a Ukrainian IP, but let’s not kid ourselves—that doesn’t tell us much. Cybersecurity experts know that IP addresses can be spoofed as easily as a high schooler faking a doctor’s note. The hacking group Dark Storm, which has historically focused on targeting Israeli and NATO-linked organizations, took credit for the attack.

That’s interesting because, on paper, they have little direct stake in Russia and Ukraine’s peace talks. But this is where things get tricky: could Dark Storm be acting as a proxy for another power? Could this be a Russian effort to frame Ukraine? Or an entirely separate party using an ongoing geopolitical crisis as a smokescreen for their own agenda?

Regardless of who’s behind it, the implications are dangerous. A single cyberattack, especially one that disrupts communication or infrastructure, could tank already fragile negotiations. It’s the digital equivalent of lobbing a grenade into a peace summit.

If we’ve learned anything from modern cyber warfare, it’s that false-flag operations are standard practice. Russia has a well-documented history of using cyber tactics to create confusion and misdirection. Their state-sponsored hacker groups—often referred to as Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)—are notorious for operations that masquerade as hacktivism. Fancy Bear, a GRU-linked hacking unit, has a long rap sheet of digital sabotage, including attacks on the U.S. Democratic National Committee and European governments. The goal? Sow discord, destabilize narratives, and create plausible deniability.

If Russian actors wanted to slow down or derail Ukraine’s negotiations with the West, launching an attack from a Ukrainian IP address would be a brilliant (if not predictable) move. Western governments, wary of cyber aggression, might second-guess their support for Ukraine if they believed Kyiv was behind a high-profile cyber assault. And if this attack on X isn’t the last—and it won’t be—expect more digital smokescreens designed to confuse, divide, and inflame tensions.

Now, let’s zoom out. The world isn’t just dealing with a Ukraine-Russia cyber problem. Hacktivists, cyber criminals, and state-sponsored cyber terrorists like Lotus Panda are thriving in this chaotic environment. And the damages are not limited to the public sector, as the recent Microsoft Account Locked scam, for example, is just one of thousands of phishing schemes targeting individuals.

Cryptocurrency markets, which President Trump has recently championed, are also under siege, with scams like the Cloudxbit scheme draining digital wallets faster than you can say “blockchain.” Meanwhile, ransomware gangs like Black Basta are holding businesses hostage, exposing the internal workings of cybercrime syndicates that operate more like Fortune 500 companies than rogue groups of hackers.
This is the new reality: cyber threats aren’t just hitting governments and corporations—they’re trickling down to everyday people. If a hacker group can compromise a major social media platform, imagine what they can do to financial institutions, healthcare systems, power grids, or even small businesses. Cyber warfare is no longer an abstract, futuristic concept. It’s here, it’s happening, and it’s evolving at breakneck speed.

With hacktivism on the rise and geopolitical tensions playing out in cyberspace, here are some possible remedies:

Better Attribution Mechanisms – Countries need stronger digital forensics capabilities to track and expose real culprits. Without definitive attribution, false flags will continue to muddy the waters.

International Cyber Treaties – Just as nuclear weapons have strict international oversight, cyber weapons need better global regulation. We’re way past the point of treating these threats as mere “hacker problems.”

Stronger Public Awareness – If you think cyber warfare is just a government problem, think again. Businesses and individuals need to be educated on security basics, from avoiding cyber threats to securing digital assets and leveraging online technical support options.

More Investment in Cyber Defense – The West, and particularly Ukraine, must bolster its cybersecurity infrastructure. Governments should treat cybersecurity as a frontline defense mechanism, not an afterthought.

Hacktivism is no longer just about rebellious teens defacing websites with digital graffiti. It’s a geopolitical weapon, one that can shift narratives, derail peace efforts, and wreak havoc on global security. The recent attack on X is a prime example of how murky the cyber battlefield has become—was it an internal Ukrainian protest, a Russian false-flag, or an unrelated rogue actor? The terrifying answer is: it could be any of the above.

As the world tiptoes toward a resolution in Ukraine, the cyber war will rage on. And unless governments, businesses, and individuals take cybersecurity seriously, we might all find ourselves caught in the crossfire of the next digital attack. Because in the world of hacktivism, peace is just another vulnerability waiting to be exploited.

Julio Rivera is a business and political strategist, the Editorial Director for Reactionary Times and a political commentator and columnist. His writing, which is focused on cybersecurity and politics, has been published by websites including The Hill, Real Clear Politics, Townhall and American Thinker.

Latest posts by Julio Rivera (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.