‘Many need to be removed’

Attorney General Pam Bondi is putting activist judges on notice.

Bondi told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham that district judges standing in the way of the America First agenda “need to be removed.”

“Judge Beryl Howell is an Obama appointed district judge, I believe, in the district of D.C. — District of Columbia, and is extremely upset at what he thinks is a series of attacks by the DOJ on the judiciary, saying, when the DOJ engages in this rhetorical strategy of ad hominem attack, the stakes become much larger than only the reputation of the targeted federal judge. This strategy is designed to impugn the integrity of the federal judicial system,” the host of Fox News Channel’s ‘The Ingraham Angle’ began on Wednesday night.

“I guess the DOJ lawyers wanted to remove Judge Howell from the case, citing other, what they believed were biased comments,” Ingraham continued. “Your reaction to Judge Howell tonight?”

Bondi did not mince words.

“We do. Many judges need to be removed, Judge Howell included. Judge Reyes, Judge Boasberg … these judges obviously cannot be impartial. They cannot be objective,” Bondi said.

AG Pam Bondi: “Many judges need to be removed — Judge Howell included, along with Judge Reyes and Judge Boasberg.”pic.twitter.com/oJvyBUzRqN

— Department of Government Efficiency News (@DOGE__news) March 28, 2025

“They are district judges trying to control our entire country — our entire country, and they’re trying to obstruct Donald Trump’s agenda.”

Ingraham then astutely called out the absurdity of Judge Boasberg, the same judge who tried to block deportations of violent illegal alien gang members, being assigned to the ‘Signalgate’ nothingburger scandal.

“Judge Boasberg is a busy judge. He was assigned to the Signalgate, which is such a ridiculous name but the Signal chat case, which is a lawsuit filed by parties which I’m not sure they have standing to file… Your reaction tonight to that?” Ingraham asked.

“Laura, he has multiple cases,” Bondi began. “I guess it’s a wild coincidence against Donald Trump and our administration, and — and now he has the Signal case. He shouldn’t be on any of these cases. He cannot be objective. He’s made that crystal clear.

A.G. PAM BONDI: THE JUDGE SHOULDN’T BE ON ANY OF THESE CASES, HE CAN’T BE OBJECTIVE

Laura Ingraham:

“President Trump calls it disgraceful that this judge—who’s ruled against you on the Tren de Aragua deportations—is now assigned to the Signal case.”

A.G. Bondi:

“Laura, he… https://t.co/qyWzXkE2CN pic.twitter.com/Q4pyFf47cg

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) March 28, 2025

“You know, these judges are taking personal attacks to it, at many of the cabinet secretaries. And these judges across the country — and again, they think they have authority, but it’s going to be short-lived because these cases are going to get to the Supreme Court very fast. We’re doing everything we can.”

Latest posts by Nicole Haas (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.