AG Pam Bondi to release more Epstein docs – warns some will be ‘redacted’

Patience is wearing thin over the slooowww roll of the Epstein documents, which were promised to be released.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna called the first wave of released documents a “complete disappointment” last week, when the information that surfaced ended up being documents already given to the public.

In other words, it was a colossal nothingburger.

Last week, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed anger over what was handed over by the FBI for “Phase 1” of the release and demanded real evidence be turned in by Friday.

“You’re looking at these documents going, ‘These aren’t all the Epstein files.’ There were flight logs, there were names, victims’ names, and we’re going, ‘Where’s the rest of the stuff?’

“That’s what the FBI had turned over to us,” Bondi told Fox News’ Sean Hannity at the time. “So a source said, ‘Whoa, all this evidence is sitting in the Southern District of New York.’

So based on that, I gave them the deadline, Friday at 8, a truckload of evidence arrived.”

“It’s now in the possession of the FBI. Kash is going to get me, and himself really, a detailed report as to why all these documents and evidence had been withheld,” Bondi added. “We’re going

to go through it, go through it as fast as we can, but go through it very cautiously to protect all the victims of Epstein because there are a lot of victims.”

Only now, Bondi is declaring that the parts of the newly released “truckload” of Epstein-related documents will be redacted over “national security concerns.”

Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted due to “national security concerns.”

So what the hell was this for? pic.twitter.com/OOmc6iaskf

— Isabella Maria DeLuca (@IsabellaMDeLuca) March 7, 2025

For Americans who already felt burned over the disastrous Phase 1 release, this didn’t sit well and sparked a flurry of speculation.

Not even President Trump can bat 100%. He has a record, but this Epstein thing exposes a possible big problem in his administration.

I can’t think of any other cabinet member I have not been blown away by when I see them talk and deliver on their words.

Is there a video? We…

— Dave Lalande (@davelalande) March 7, 2025

Does security concerns mean some “important high level” government official was involved in child prostitution? And he/she is being protected??

— Horst Schmidt (@Magoo12Chef) March 7, 2025

That’s 2 big Ls for Bondi on the same topic in less than 2 weeks. All because she over promised something she had next to no knowledge about. Anyone think she might be the first Trump appointee to get fired?

— CassiusVictus (@CassiusVictus) March 7, 2025

Country artist John Rich called Bondi’s declaration the “question of the day” and got plenty of feedback when he asked why the information needs to be redacted.

Because the people named in those files aren’t just rich degenerates, they’re the ones running the show. Politicians, intelligence operatives, global elites, Epstein wasn’t just trafficking girls, he was trafficking blackmail. If those files drop, it’s not just reputations on the…

— MAG1775 (@Mar50cC5O) March 6, 2025

This is not acceptable. I don’t GAF who or what is exposed—be it politician, military officer or those of an “ally.”

Full transparency. Full accountability.

Stop shoveling the “national security” horse shit.

— HodorsNutz (@HodorsNutz) March 7, 2025

When they tell you they are redacting things for national security it really means there are names of high-up people they are covering for. Other than victims’ names, NOTHING should be redacted from the Epstein files. There are ZERO national security issues! If world leaders are…

— Sadie (@Sadie_NC) March 7, 2025

Whatever the case, the secrecy around the Epstein files is only adding fuel to the fiery calls to make them public.

Latest posts by Nicole Haas (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.